Abstract
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Dec;21 Suppl 2:e105672. doi: 10.1002/alz70856_105672.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Lumipulse®G pTau217 assay is among the highest performing plasma assays available for detecting amyloid pathology. Recently, Fujirebio has submitted the Lumipulse® G pTau 217/β-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio to the FDA. The aim of the current study was to assess the utility of these assays for classifying amyloid and tau PET status in a risk-enriched preclinical Alzheimer's disease cohort.
METHOD: 190 plasma samples from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center were selected and analyzed using the Lumipulse®G pTau 217 Plasma assay. Another set of 451 plasma samples were selected and analyzed using the Lumipulse® G pTau 217/β-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio. 38 samples were analyzed using both assays. Amyloid and tau positivity were determined based on visual reads of [C-11]PiB and [F-18]Florquinitau PET scans, respectively. We used ROC analyses to assess the amyloid and tau classification performance of the biomarkers. We used Spearman correlations to compare plasma pTau217 levels in the samples that were analyzed using both assays. All analyses were cross-sectional and the maximum time difference between plasma and PET assessment was two years.
RESULT: Sample characteristics for both the Lumipulse®G pTau 217 and Lumipulse® G pTau 217/β-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio data subsets are provided in Table 1. The ROC AUC of pTau217 was .93 for amyloid PET (95% CI .89-.98, accuracy 86%) and .93 for tau PET (95% CI .87-.99, accuracy 88%; Figure 1). The ROC AUC of the pTau217/Abeta 42 ratio was .93 for amyloid PET (95% CI .89 - .97, accuracy 90%) and .90 for tau PET (95% CI .83-.96, accuracy 68%; Figure 2). The Spearman correlation between plasma pTau217 levels was .92.
CONCLUSION: Both the Lumipulse®G pTau 217 Plasma assay and the Lumipulse® G pTau 217/β-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio accurately classified amyloid and tau status in this largely cognitively unimpaired, preclinical cohort.
PMID:41505768 | DOI:10.1002/alz70856_105672
UK DRI Authors
