Skip to main content
Search
Main content
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
Published

Developing Topics

Authors

Jason F Moody, Samriddhi Dube, William R Buckingham, W Ryan Powell, Sarah A Keller, Amanda DeWitt, Rachael E Wilson, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Sterling C Johnson, Amy J H Kind, Barbara B Bendlin

Abstract

Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Dec;21 Suppl 7:e107967. doi: 10.1002/alz70861_107967.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent literature suggests that the cumulative social determinants of health (SDOH) of a specific geographic region may have a greater impact on health outcomes compared to individual-level socioeconomic factors, including on the incidence of age-related diseases. Research is needed into how area-level disadvantage from across the life course, particularly early in life, may disproportionately affect Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology observed later in life. Plasma biomarkers have shown promise for providing a cost-effective, non-invasive means for detecting AD pathogenesis and tracking AD progression. In this study, we examine the associations between early-life area-level disadvantage and AD plasma biomarkers in aging adults.

METHODS: We recruited 1,099 participants across the AD continuum (Table 1) from one of two community-based, longitudinal cohorts enriched for AD risk who had at least 1 plasma sample assayed for markers of amyloid plaques [plasma phosphorylated tau (pTau)217, amyloid beta (Aβ)42/40 ratio], neuroinflammation [glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)], and axonal degeneration [neurofilament light (NfL)]. Early life area-level disadvantage (ages 0-18) was quantified via the county-level Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a composite marker derived from 17 census indicators of SDOH, and categorized into sample-ranked tertiles (lowest, middle, and highest). We used linear mixed-effects (LME) models with early-life ADI as the explanatory variable, adjusting for age, sex, impairment status, batch, and years of education, and included a random intercept to account for repeated, within-subject measures. Group comparisons were performed for each biomarker between pairs of ADI tertiles, controlling for error rates across multiple comparisons.

RESULTS: Participants living in the highest ADI areas exhibited higher NfL [difference (p value): 1.37 (0.033)] and GFAP [difference (p value): 10.26 (0.044)] and lower Aβ42/40 [difference (p value): 0.00328 (0.041)], compared to those in the lowest ADI tertile. No significant relationships were observed between ADI tertiles and pTau217. (Table 2, Figure 1).

CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that addressing disparities in SDOH within the critical epoch of brain development encompassing infancy, childhood, and adolescence may hold the potential to reduce the likelihood of pathological brain changes associated with AD occurring later in life, including the accumulation of amyloid plaques, neuroinflammation, and axonal injury.

PMID:41434481 | DOI:10.1002/alz70861_107967

UK DRI Authors

Profile picture of Henrik Zetterberg

Prof Henrik Zetterberg

Group Leader

Pioneering the development of fluid biomarkers for dementia

Prof Henrik Zetterberg